Peer+Review

=In the words of Bert and Ernie, "TWO HEADS ARE BETTER THAN ONE!"=

Once all passages are uploaded, you will be responsible for posting feedback to AT LEAST two commentaries. The commentaries you are to select are the two immediately following your submission. Please post them on this page. Indicate the name that corresponds to the commentary that you are addressing. Please email Ms. O a copy at pereckm@lmsd.org, as we want to make sure that all submissions successfully posted.

Please go in depth for the sake of your peers. Make sure to make specific comments, not general, ambiguous ones. Please write your responses in clear, full sentences. Think critically about what you just heard, and reply appropriately. . You are required to address: -Did the speaker address context? Purpose? -Was there an organizational principle utilized for their commentary? -What questions would you ask this person for clarification, IF YOU WERE THE ACCESSOR? -What did the speaker do well? -What would you suggest for improvement? -What did they forget to address (lit terms, themes, etc.) -What would you score them based on the rubric?
 * Please be sure to write your name under your comments, in order to be given credit for your work.**

Peer Review Rubric: -Did the student provide helpful information in a clearly written response? -Did the student offer praise, where appropriate, in a clearly written response? -Did the student offer hypothetical questions? Peer Review Value= _/15 (this is for BOTH passages)